Interview as an approach of gathering information: strategy of questions

Interview as an approach of gathering information: strategy of questions

It is crucial to tell apart interviews as a method of gathering information and interviewing as a genre . In the 1st situation, meeting, that is, interaction with individuals, is regarded as 3 ways to acquire information by a researcher. Two different ways are:

• observation, if the researcher himself is an eyewitness regarding the occasion,
• working together with papers, in which the document means any material carrier containing texts and pictures.

Forms of interviews and their purpose

Interviews as a way of data gathering in change are split into:

• genre (for planning of text into the genre of interview),
• investigative (for information),
• reportage (to spot the faculties of a person, then to mirror them within the text).

The reportage interview had been talked about when you look at the previous chapter. In regards to the investigative shall be told when youlook at the chapter on information retrieval. The theme for this chapter is meeting as a genre, as a real method of text formatting by means of concerns from a interviewer and also the answers of this interlocutor. At the same time there is an interview-monologue at one pole, where in actuality the wide range of questions of this researcher is minimized (sometimes they are not any at all), during the other pole – a discussion, as soon as the journalist not merely asks concerns, but also speaks much with lengthy arguments.

The fact that the meeting is a discussion, suggests in regards to the exact same number of replicas of the journalist and interlocutor. Into the typical meeting, the interviewer responses just take 70-90% for the text. A discussion may be conducted with a journalist, by authority equal to the interlocutor, so the viewpoint for this journalist has also been interesting to visitors, while the viewpoint of this interlocutor. If a regular journalist talks just as much or higher in a job interview as an interlocutor, this might be a indication of insufficient qualification.

Types of interviews according to the subject. Subject interview

With respect to the topic, you can find three types of interviews:

• subject,
• personal,
• subject-personal.

Subject of the subject interview is their state of things in almost any industry of task. Frequently it is a job interview with a professional, a genre of logical publicism. The interlocutor is interesting into the journalist just as much as he is related to this continuing situation. As an example, an officer informs how exactly to protect a condo from thieves. A doctor describes simple tips to protect yourself through the flu epidemic. The advisor that is financial a forecast how long the crisis will likely to be from the change. Neither the interlocutor’s viewpoint on problems that deviate from the interview subject, nor the life that is private of interlocutor is of great interest.

The dwelling associated with the subject interview consists of three parts. First, they show the interlocutor’s experience of the subject. Then there’s a parsing regarding the subject for the intended purpose of its presentation, clarification and evaluation. The topic meeting comes to an end using the streamlining of the thing that was said, summarizing, practical suggestions to readers.

The hero associated with subject interview can additionally be an eyewitness or participant in the case. This really is information meeting, among the news genres. The job associated with the journalist would be to learn whenever possible the information and information on exactly what occurred. The interlocutor’s communication with the topic is first shown, then the topic is deepened, and the ending is devoted to general impressions of what happened and the conclusions that the interlocutor made as in the case of an expert.